Monthly Archive for March, 2009

What does EDC have to do with VC Funding?

My post on Sunday discussed my dismay at seeing good Canadian entrepreneurs being told that they would have better chances getting funding if they became good US entrepreneurs.  As an example of how blogs are really pulpits, my issue was picked up by Liberal MP Scott Brison, who addressed the point in Question Period yesterday.  (See the Hansard, #32 for 24 March 09).

The Honorable Stockwell Day responded with facts about EDC and how it is facilitating $85 billion in financial activity etc….  While EDC does good work and I would recommend their services to exporters, I’m not aware that EDC provides any Venture funding.  BDC would have been a better example.  So I don’t find the answers of any help, but then perhaps I’m expecting a lot out of Question Period.

The point that the VC community is in trouble is not new.  In its latest report (January 2009), Why Venture Capital is Essential to the Canadian Economy: The Impact of Venture Capital on the Canadian Economy, the Canadian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association outlines some of the key issues:

  • Wishing to move to a knowledge based economy, the government has, in the past, created a vibrant VC community with tax incentives, government venture funds and massive R&D investments.
  • The VC funds have not generated sufficient returns to attract new investment and (in the last four years) the government (both provincial and federal) has moved to indirect support while reducing the direct funding and tax credits. Both these factors have significantly reduced the ability of VC funds to raise new capital.
  • The loss of Canadian funding, which declined by 35% since 2003 until the start of the financial crisis in Q4 2008, has been compensated by an increase in US based funding but that this sometimes results in a shift of company activities to the US. (US VCs will invest in Canadian companies if there is a majority Canadian investor. A majority US investor will want the company located in the US, usually within a hour’s drive of the VC’s office.)

Why is it important to fix the VC situation?  The relatively large amounts spent on R&D in Canada produce results in terms of innovation.  For this innovation to have any impact on the Canadian economy, it needs to be turned into businesses and this requires funding.  Venture Capital is an important part of the economic ecosystem that facilitates the creation of these businesses.  Without it, the innovative technologies developed in Canada will find their way to other countries.

What is to be done?  Find innovative ways to develop the funding and do so quickly.  If VC funds develop such poor returns and yet are so critical for the economy, perhaps it would be prudent to consider increasing direct funding from the government, not as an investment but as infrastructure for the economy.  Let’s start a conversation on the topic.

Canadian Gov moving Canadian companies to the US!?

It appears the Canadian Government and OCRI are sponsoring Canadian Entrepreneurs to move to the US.  SO much for strengthening the tech sector in Ottawa.

I was at a DFAIT sponsored event last week called the Canadian Regional Boot Camp for Technology Start-Ups featuring Silicon Valley experts and investors.  Essentially a training and practice session on making the pitch to VCs with a focus on the US.  On the surface, it seems like a good program:  help entrepreneurs in Canada find partnerships and funding in the US by providing access to VC, angels networks and Fortune 500 ICT companies in Silicon Valley. 

The boot Camp is followed by a program where selected start-ups visit San Jose for up to three months, with “subsidized access” to the Canadian Incubator program in Silicon Valley (meeting rooms, coaching, networking events etc…)  all with the intent of finding financing in the US.

But there’s a catch.  Not mentioned on the web site, and buried in the first few presentations in the day was the following comment: US Venture Capitalists will not invest in Canadian Companies.  The advice:

Convert the Canadian Company to a US company and move the HQ to Silicon Valley

The following presentations discussed how to convert a Canadian company into a Delaware “C” Corporation and the need to move the HQ to the US.  Of course, keep the R&D in Canada where generous SR&ED tax credits make it worthwhile.  I was gobsmacked - shocked and appalled.  DFAIT is paying for this??  OCRI is supporting this?? Something is seriously wrong here!

You can’t blame the entrepreneurs.  There is pitifully little venture capital in Canada at the moment.  Tax incentive cuts and poor performance of venture funds in the past have decimated the VC funds in the last year.  About the only source of funds is in the US where conditions are more favorable. If you have to leave Canada to get the funding and support your dream, well, that’s what you do. There is no loyalty and there really shouldn’t be.  Its business, after all.

But you can blame the government.  DFAIT and OCRI, intent on helping entrepreneurs, are helping them move to the US.  This is just misguided policy at its worst.  I’d expect the Canadian Government to support the creation of a strong entrepernurial ecosystem in Canada.  The ecosystem is a cornerstone of creating businesses of all types.  Its a necessary condition for a thriving culture of innovation.  Instead, I find OCRI and DFAIT working against the goals of a stronger Canada in their efforts to help. 

If they really want to help, figure out a way to shore up the VC funds in Canada.  Improve the tax structure.  Make VC funding part of the infrastructure program.  As an investment, funding entrepreneurs has a pretty poor return.  But as an infrastructure program, responsible for creating and supporting the economic ecosystem, it probably more important than a building with a fancy lobby.

In Praise of GNU Cash

I’m becoming a bit of a GNU Cashevangelist.  Having used the open-source software now for two months, I find it to be quite adequate for a small business environment.  It has the rigour I’d expect from an accounting package - double entry accounting, charts of accounts, standard reports and the like.  It also has a pretty good investment tracking package and the ability to download data directly from the banks.  I haven’t got this last bit working but I have been able to import the Quicken or Quick Books files my banks will produce without any trouble at all.

While GNU Cash isn’t an MRP system, it can be used successfully in a small business context.  If you are currently running your business with a spreadsheet, then GNU cash would be great upgrade.  It can easily handle invoicing, receivables, bills, payables and payroll.

What I like most is that it is free and well supported - the mailing lists and chat always seem to be active.

What do you think?